True Murder Cases: Unbelievable Miscarriages of Justice That Will Shock and Appall You

Wrongful Convictions: True Murder Cases Unbelievable Miscarriages of Justice

by Jack Smith

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	7340 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	106 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The justice system is supposed to be a beacon of fairness and accuracy, a place where the innocent are protected and the guilty are punished. But as these true murder cases show, the system is far from perfect. In these cases, innocent people were wrongly convicted of murder, spending years or even decades in prison for crimes they didn't commit.

The Case of Amanda Knox

Amanda Knox was a 20-year-old American student studying in Italy when she was accused of murdering her roommate, Meredith Kercher. Knox and her then-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, were convicted of the crime in 2007 and sentenced to 26 and 25 years in prison, respectively.

The case against Knox was based largely on circumstantial evidence, and there were many inconsistencies in the prosecution's story. Knox and Sollecito both maintained their innocence, and they appealed their convictions.

In 2011, Knox and Sollecito were acquitted of Kercher's murder. The Italian Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were guilty.

The Case of the West Memphis Three

In 1993, three teenagers in West Memphis, Arkansas, were convicted of murdering three young boys. The teenagers, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley, became known as the "West Memphis Three."

The case against the West Memphis Three was based on coerced confessions and questionable forensic evidence. The teenagers maintained their innocence, and they appealed their convictions.

In 2011, the West Memphis Three were released from prison after spending 18 years in prison. They entered Alford pleas, which allowed them to maintain their innocence while acknowledging that there was enough evidence to convict them.

The Case of Ryan Ferguson

Ryan Ferguson was a 19-year-old college student when he was accused of murdering a newspaper editor in Columbia, Missouri. Ferguson was convicted of the crime in 2005 and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

The case against Ferguson was based on the testimony of a jailhouse informant who claimed that Ferguson had confessed to the murder. Ferguson maintained his innocence, and his supporters argued that the informant's testimony was unreliable.

In 2013, Ferguson was released from prison after spending 10 years in prison. His conviction was overturned after new DNA evidence was discovered that excluded him as the murderer.

The Case of Anthony Graves

Anthony Graves was a 26-year-old man when he was accused of murdering a preacher and his four daughters in Texas. Graves was convicted of the crime in 1992 and sentenced to death.

The case against Graves was based on the testimony of a jailhouse informant who claimed that Graves had confessed to the murder. Graves maintained his innocence, and his supporters argued that the informant's testimony was unreliable.

In 2010, Graves was released from prison after spending 18 years on death row

Wrongful Convictions: True Murder Cases Unbelievable Miscarriages of Justice

by Jack Smith

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	7340 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	106 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE